August prints from native plants: Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia)

Eco dyeing and printing are seasonal activities for me, closely tied to my garden's rhythms. Late summer and early fall in AgCan/USDA zones 4/5 is a period rich in accumulated plant pigments. Even though eco printing as a technique relies on the knowledge of tradional dyeing, it does not always turn up the same pigments in the dye pot as do the traditional “whole cloth, dye bath” techniques for dyeing fibres.

Furthermore, due to the nature of the eco print processes ( bundling, stacking, steaming, composting, tying, solarizing, etc.) , more than one colour may show up from one plant on a dye printed surface. This happens when the eco print processes force pigments in the plants to separate out into constituent colours on the surface of the substrate. These colour differences can often lost be when the plants are processed to extract colours by first heating them in water in a pot to make a dye bath, then processing the fibres in the dye bath to take up the colour.

I like to approach my print surfaces as if they were abstract compostions; thus, I am concerned with the interplay among colours, forms and field. The second image (rather far below) shows silk crepe de chine eco printed with a selection of native plants from my garden last week: a background lightly coloured pale- ish yellow by just a tad of goldenrod ( a few sprigs removed from the tops), a lot of coreopsis verticillata (the whole plant in bits) to give small, varied and strong red-orange marks, the blue-black berries of Aronia melanocarpa ( black chokeberry) smooshed on to contribute blue, purple and lavender areas to the field (plus the darks and lights of analagous colours, as does the coreopsis), purple sandcherry leaves for deep teal greens (not shown), and on the right, a Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quiquefolia) leaflet in its red fall colours – but scarcely any eco print from it.

This image right below shows coreopsis (red and oranges) and red cabbage (blues) on silk. The colours and distribution of forms across the field of the textile reminded me of flower paintings by Seurat and Odilon Redon- along with the orange-blue Impressionist fave colour combos. Playing with the dye outcomes is for me the most fascinating part of contact printing with plants

Back to the Virginia creeper (VC)

VC, a native vine, is not much used in the traditional dye pot, as far as I can tell. It seems to be a kind of Bait and Switch plant, flaunting spectacular red and purple fall foliage, adorned with rich bunches of black berries that birds devour; but it appears to be a Tame, Timid and Stripeless Tiger in the trad dye pot. Adrosko, Cannon, Casselman and Dean (to mention some Big Trad Dye Names, see my References page) make no mention of VC as a dye plant. Other sources do mention it but without enthusiasm: Richards and Tyrl in their book on on North American dye plants have it classified in their chapter about plants that give little or no colour, noting only a pale yellow-cream. ( I guess that is the chapter every poor dye plant dreads to be consigned to… But take heart, Virginia creepers. Eco printing is your friend.)

Daniel Moerman (in “Native American Ethnobotany” ) writes with erudition that the Kiowa Indian tribe (in Canadian usage: “First Nations” or Kiowa native peoples) obtained pink dyes from VC berries to colour feathers used in war dances.

The notion of long-term “fastness” is not generallly addressed, other than to recommend the use of the Usual Suspects as mordants. I suspect tannins and iron might help VC colour up in an eco print process more than in the trad dye pot.

The only really hopeful discussion about potential eco print colour from the VC appears in a 1986 publication entitled “Dye Plants of Ontario” from the Burr House Spinners and Weavers Guild ( see Reference page). The guild tested the vine for dye potential, using the whole plant, having gathered it in November and noting: “This vine is not known as a dye plant.”

With alum as mordant , a 6:1 plant-to-water ratio and 45 minutes in a simmering dye bath, the colour given is “butterscotch”. Other mordants were as follows: with copper, a rich tan; with iron, a golden tan. As a modifier post-dye bath, iron gave deep bronze; ammonia, a bright golden tan. Summer foliage gave ivory with an ammonia rinse, and olive greens with a vinegar rinse. No longer recommended as mordants are tin and chrome though the Burr House dyers did report their experiments with these.

Thus, with this info In mind, I plan to experiment further with the Virginia creeper as it matures in my garden and in the environs.

And after all that “learned” text above, I expect, Dear Reader, that you will be wondering when your author will finally put up the Eye Candy.

Here it is:

 

The red leaf on the right is one leaflet of the five leaflets ( the “quinque” in quinquefolia) of the Virginia creeper. But hardly any eco print at all. The reds and purples came from coreopsis and aronia berries, though of course, one could be forgiven for hoping the VC had printed thus. But we know that what we see in a leaf is not what we necessarily get on an eco printed substrate. (And I think snails ate the holes in the VC leaflet – the vine was covered in snails. )

Next, I will mess around with tannins and iron to see if an eco print can be coaxed out of the Virginia creeper. There were no iron bits, bark or tannin rich plants in the bundle shown here. Of course, I am just guessing that we could get a print from the VC in the environment of these mordants/dye assistants. TBD.

Inspiration for this post

Thanks to the edltor of the Journal for Weavers, Spinners and Dyers who asked me about fastness of dye in the Virginia creeper. That question became my research topic for today, and led me down this most interesting rabbit hole. I have been planting lots of the native Virginia creeper this summer to attract birds, to give fall colour, to cover the tattier parts of our fence and to give privacy. Perhaps VC leaves can make an interesting eco print, or perhaps the VC berries can dye some war dance feathers pink (gonna try for those pink feathers for sure but maybe will weave them into the garden loom instead of my hair. Turn swords to ploughshares, kind of.)

Meanwhile, here is a taste of some more Eye Candy in relation to future posts about dyeing with native plants. The next post will be about eco prints on silk with other native plants from my garden. See if you can guess the plants printed here:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hints: Walnut, coreopsis, sumac, aronia berries, rose, cotinus, goldenrod, purple sandcherry.

 

Until next time

 

Wendy

 

Advertisements

About wendyfe

I am a fibre artist working in mixed media textiles with a focus on vintage cloth reworked with stitching, natural dyeing, eco printing and rust printing . My work can be seen at www.wendyfeldberg.ca.
This entry was posted in dyeing with native plants, dyeing with virginia creeper, Eco Prints, Journal for Weavers, Spinners and Dyers and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to August prints from native plants: Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia)

  1. arlee says:

    Ahhh, as i have noted too, the best months for Zone 3 where i am, is September and October, sometimes into November if the snow hasn’t hit yet 🙂 Alberta can be quite frustrating in that respect! I never had any luck with the VC either, and as we don’t have as much variety in indigenous plants that *do* give colour, it gets quite disheartening finding something that works. The best one here, though some other gatherings give results, is the Cornus, or red dogwood, a ubiquitous river and marshy area inhabitant.

    • wendyfe says:

      Hi arlee!
      I read recently an official update in the Can/US garden zone designations – I think it was on the “Garden Making” site. It noted that Calgary varies from 2b to 4. That is a challenge! I have not used local dogwood much but this year I have some in the new garden, so will be trying it, and checking your experience for advice. My selection of fresh plants for eco prints is narrowing on purpose these days. Am intrigued to try VC later in the year, before the leaves drop off. The November harvest by the Burr House dyers was carried out near Toronto, which is a zone warmer than us here in Ottawa. So I am watching the plant, not the calendar. Good to get your feedback on VC
      W

      • arlee says:

        Yes,it’s surprising what does and doesn’t survive sometimes because of the zone thing–i tend to stay in the middle to be safe!

        A note too, on “holey” leaves–they add beautiful contrasts in void space and colour 🙂 I love the red osier late when the bugs have been at it, and the natural effects of disintegration have started.

  2. Amanda says:

    What a great post. So informative and therefore inspiring. Thanks so much for sharing this in such detail.

  3. coolquilting says:

    thanks for info on the VC…
    we “lost” ours last summer(it was cut to the ground when a new deck was installed)…but it is recovering and should be great for next year…Can’t wait to try it

  4. mirjamgielen says:

    Hi Wendy,
    I have had good results with the berries from the VC. In eco print on alum mordanted wool they gave blue/purple hues. I did this a year ago, and the colours didn’t change since. In a traditional dye bath on unmordanted cotton and alum mordanted linen a more reddish purple, a very deep and intense colour. It has yet to prove its lightfastness, but so far I am very satisfied.

    The (red coloured autumn) leafs give a light pinkish color in a traditional dye bath, but I didn’t use a lot of leaves, so maybe some more experimenting is needed. Thank you for sharing your information about the several mordants. I’m gonna experiment with those too.

    Your eco prints are gorgeous, very beautiful results!
    Mirjam

    • wendyfe says:

      Thank you. Mirjam. What a great report on Virgiia Creeper! You may indeed be right that more experimentation could result in longer- lasting prints. The traditional dye literature by experts, for the most part, have not pursued this plant as a source of dye when they report results with immersion dye baths and common mordants. I wonder if it is possible that the eco print process itself is what makes the difference? And if iron in the bundle or an iron blanket ( the latter is much reported these days) would give good prints?

      Good luck with your dye pots!

      Wendy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s